뉴욕타임즈 칼럼: 몰락한 중산 계급

Column: THE FORMERLY MIDDLE CLASS
  조회:  3,178   등록 일자: November 18   카테고리: 
At the beginning of every recession, there are people who see the downturn as an occasion for moral revival: Americans will learn to live without material extravagances. They’ll simplify their lives. They’ll rediscover what really matters: home, friends and family. 경제침체가 시작될 때마다 그러한 경기 악화가 도덕적인 부활을 이룩할 기회라고 보는 사람들이 으레 있다. 미국 사람들이 물질적 사치 행위 없이 사는 법을 배울 것이라고 생각하는 것이다. 그들은 생활을 간소화 할 것이며, 무엇이 정말로 중요한 지를 – 즉 집, 친구와 가족이 중요함을 - 재발견 할 것이라는 이야기다. But recessions are about more than material deprivation. They’re also about fear and diminished expectations. The cultural consequences of recessions are rarely uplifting. 그러나 경제 침체는 단순히 물질적인 결핍만을 뜻하는 것이 아니다. 거기에는 두려움과 기대의 축소가 따르게 되어 있다. 경제 침체가 문화에 미치는 영향이 고무적인 경우는 매우 드물다. The economic slowdown of the 1880s and 1890s produced a surge of agrarian populism and nativism, with particular hostility directed toward Catholics, Jews and blacks. The Great Depression was not only a time of F.D.R.’s optimism and escapist movies, it was also a time of apocalyptic forebodings and collectivist movements that crushed individual rights. 1880년대와 1890년대에 일어난 경기 후퇴는 농촌 지대에서의 포퓰리즘과 이민 배척 주의의 급승세를 가져왔다. 특히 반감의 대상이 되었던 것은 천주교 신도들, 유대인들 그리고 흑인들이었다. 대공황 시대는 FDR (루즈벨트 대통령)의 낙관주의와 도피성 영화들의 시대이었을 뿐 아니라 종말론적 예언들과 개인의 권리를 유린하는 집단주의 운동들의 시대였다. The recession of the 1970s produced a cynicism that has never really gone away. The share of students who admitted to cheating jumped from 34 percent in 1969 to 60 percent a decade later. More than a quarter of all employees said the goods they produced were so shoddily made that they wouldn’t buy them for themselves. As David Frum noted in his book, “How We Got Here,” job dissatisfaction in 1977 was higher than at any time in the previous quarter-century. Recessions breed pessimism. That’s why birthrates tend to drop and suicide rates tend to rise. That’s why hemlines go down. Tamar Lewin of The New York Times reported on studies that show that the women selected to be Playboy Playmates of the Year tend to look more mature during recessions — older, heavier, more reassuring — though I have not verified this personally. This recession will probably have its own social profile. In particular, it’s likely to produce a new social group: the formerly middle class. These are people who achieved middle-class status at the tail end of the long boom, and then lost it. To them, the gap between where they are and where they used to be will seem wide and daunting. The phenomenon is noticeable in developing nations. Over the past decade, millions of people in these societies have climbed out of poverty. But the global recession is pushing them back down. Many seem furious with democracy and capitalism, which they believe led to their shattered dreams. It’s possible that the downturn will produce a profusion of Hugo Chávezes. It’s possible that the Obama administration will spend much of its time battling a global protest movement that doesn’t even exist yet. In this country, there are also millions of people facing the psychological and social pressures of downward mobility. In the months ahead, the members of the formerly middle class will suffer career reversals. Paco Underhill, the retailing expert, tells me that 20 percent of the mall storefronts could soon be empty. That fact alone means that thousands of service-economy workers will experience the self-doubt that goes with unemployment. They will suffer lifestyle reversals. Over the past decade, millions of Americans have had unprecedented access to affordable luxuries, thanks to brands like Coach, Whole Foods, Tiffany and Starbucks. These indulgences were signs of upward mobility. But these affordable luxuries will no longer be so affordable. Suddenly, the door to the land of the upscale will slam shut for millions of Americans. The members of the formerly middle class will suffer housing reversals. The current mortgage crisis is having its most concentrated effect on people on the lowest rungs of middle-class life — people who live in fast-growing exurbs in Florida and Nevada that are now rife with foreclosures; people who just moved out of their urban neighborhoods and made it to modest, older suburbs in California and Michigan. Suddenly, the home of one’s own is gone, and it’s back to the apartment complex. Finally, they will suffer a drop in social capital. In times of recession, people spend more time at home. But this will be the first steep recession since the revolution in household formation. Nesting amongst an extended family rich in social capital is very different from nesting in a one-person household that is isolated from family and community bonds. People in the lower middle class have much higher divorce rates and many fewer community ties. For them, cocooning is more likely to be a perilous psychological spiral. In this recession, maybe even more than other ones, the last ones to join the middle class will be the first ones out. And it won’t only be material deprivations that bites. It will be the loss of a social identity, the loss of social networks, the loss of the little status symbols that suggest an elevated place in the social order. These reversals are bound to produce alienation and a political response. If you want to know where the next big social movements will come from, I’d say the formerly middle class. By DAVID BROOKS (November 18, 2008)
관련 기사보기
본 내용을 무단 전재, 도용할 경우 저작권법에 의해 엄중 처벌 받게 될 것임을 경고합니다